NP: Audioslave, Audioslave
As expected, someone at Daily Kos has already made the leap from data about phone calls to listening in to every phone call. The real salient point, as pointed out by Josh Marshall and some others, is that the NSA is allegedly using the data about the calls to figure out which calls they actually do want to listen to. This is where the questions of legality should be focused.
It also cuts to the whole notion of liberals spitting out the words "data mining" the way conservatives spit out the word "liberal" that I've touched on previously The part of the equation that no one seems to disagree with is that we should actually be surveilling the bad guys. Except that you do, in fact, have to have a method by which you identify those bad guys. If the government actually has some number of phone numbers from known terrorists, you sort of need to compare them to "normal" calls in order to train the model to tell the difference between a good guy and a bad guy based on the metadata of the phone calls. And its possible to do that with some degree of anonymity within the larger database, so that the algorithm identifies the pattern independent of the caller.
Now, it may be the case that its much easier to tell the difference between a good guy call and a bad guy call if the identities of the caller and the callee are known, and this is where it gets messy and invasive, because given everything we know about the Bush adminstration, they would absolutely take the shortcut at the expense of, say, civil liberties. Again, I'm not defending the program, just pointing out that it can be done with some measure of privacy safeguards in place, and that data mining in and of itself is not evil.
You know, Coz, you list "DailyKos" as if it's a monilithic voice, and then you pick and choose which blogger on Kos you link to to prove that "the left is already claiming they're listening to the phone calls, not simply data mining."
Hogwash. Don't make me post several links to columnists writing at the Daily Kos who do no such thing, who *don't* conflate data mining with "listening to phone calls."
Furthermore, this is what I personally dislike about the so-called "I"m an independent, the Dems are as bas as the Reps" crowd. You began the day trying to equate the "badness" of warrantless eavesdropping and data mining without warrants and the possible abuses therein with the "badness" of *possibly, maybe" The Left conflating/confusing/making a leap to claim that this is the same as listening to all phone calls.
The two are not the same, sorry. One is indeed worse. The gymnastics some undergo in order to make everything appear the same, Right Or Left, is troublesome.
So Daley might be dirty, huh? Huh. Yeah. Thus, obviously and QED, the ethics problems in politics right now are CLEARLY bipartisan.
Yeah. And while Kerry *did* get some purple hearts and a Silver Star, it's important that we do mention that some who never served with him claim he didn't deserve them. Just to be, you know, bipartisan and fair.
Screw being fair. The Abrahamoff scandal is a Republican problem, not a "bipartisan problem". The president's approval rating is more important than congress' approval rating in general.
And yes, given the abuses with this administration, data mining of *every single phone call made in the US* without any oversight is indeed a much bigger potential problem than someone on some Leftist blog engaging in hyperbole.
I actually agree that the faux-centrist/objective "let's hear both sides of the story" thing is bullshit. I don't think that I was equating the badness of the program with that of making it look worse than it is. My point was just that it's already bad enough, and that the loud voices on the left don't need to oversell it. And further, that overselling it can damage your credibility for those times when you're going to need it.
As for singling out a single DKos front page diarist, or whatever they call it, the point I was making, starting with the post before this one, was that I knew it was going to happen. The fully-formed and unposted thought was that, in fact, I expected either one of the main bloggers at dKos or a member of the House of Representatives to say it, although I would have put the over/under at 48 hours and gotten badly burned on the under.
Fred Kaplan had a good piece on the NSA program, too. I'll try to post something on that later.
notabbott.com is not spamming you -- please read
however, if you'd like e-mails about upcoming shows and whatnot, click here
Housekeeping note
January 2, 2014
Slacker Profiteering
July 7, 2013
In My Defense
June 20, 2013
When A Foul Isn't A Foul
February 5, 2013
All content on this website (including text, photographs, audio files, and any other original works), unless otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons License.