August 15, 2007
Cause And Effect
NP: The Colbert Report
So, Lifehacker points out that Wired points out how you can see who is behind anonymous Wikipedia edits, and then Fox News, The New York Times and Diebold all get fingered. I'm guessing the two are somehow related.
The more amusing angle is that the Fark.com entries were "obvious" for Fox News and Diebold, but "asinine" for the New York Times. I think that is somehow revealing, although I'm not sure exactly what.
I have a hunch this is going to turn into a mammoth crowdsourcing effort, and that these three examples will be just the tip of the iceberg. It's the first Web 2.0 scandal! Maybe!
Comments
Post a comment
about notabbott.com
what is it?
notabbott.com is not spamming you -- please read
however, if you'd like e-mails about upcoming shows and whatnot, click here
search
recent entries in MAIN
Domino Effects
March 4, 2015
March 4, 2015
Housekeeping note
January 2, 2014
Slacker Profiteering
July 7, 2013
In My Defense
June 20, 2013
When A Foul Isn't A Foul
February 5, 2013
archives by month
March 2015
1 posts
January 2014
1 posts
July 2013
1 posts
June 2013
1 posts
February 2013
1 posts
January 2013
4 posts
COMPLETE MONTHLY ARCHIVES
1 posts
January 2014
1 posts
July 2013
1 posts
June 2013
1 posts
February 2013
1 posts
January 2013
4 posts
COMPLETE MONTHLY ARCHIVES
credits
All content on this website (including text, photographs, audio files, and any other original works), unless otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
