« Those Pesky Robot Defenses | Main

October 18, 2007

Validating Rove

NP: Pandora

I'm not usually one to cover the Supreme Court beat, but reading this week's Michael Miner column in The Reader got me thinking.

Miner uses the Supremes' recent Bowles vs. Russell decision -- more of a non-decision, really, in that the court declared it had no jurisdiction over the case -- to paint a dystopian picture of an American where an overzealous government uses strict, literal interpretations of vaguely written laws to lock up domestic dissenters without trial or other legal recourse. Good for him, but that's not what piqued my interest.

The case involved a man being denied appeal because he was two days late filing it, on account of being given the wrong date by a district judge. The Supreme Court ruled it couldn't consider why the appeal was filed late because it was filed late.

The message that I'm taking from this is that it practically codifies the Rove attack machine M.O. When given false information, it is the responsibility of the receiver of that information to ensure that it is, in fact, correct. That the receiver was given false information -- a statute of limitations, a bogus claim about someone's record, etc. -- apparently isn't any reason for concern. And in claiming no jurisdiction over whether the late appeal could be heard specifically because it was late, rather than based on the merit of the argument, there seems to be no distinction between accidentally giving that false information and deliberately lying.

I think maybe Fox News honcho Roger Ailes has that embroidered on a pillow.

Also worth noting in the column is a quote from the text of the Military Commissions Act, which reads that "a military commission under this chapter shall have jurisdiction to try any offense made punishable by this chapter or the law of war when committed by an alien unlawful enemy combatant before, on, or after September 11, 2001." Emphasis mine. The law is saying that when you broke this law is immaterial, but they stuck in the 9/11 reference just for kicks. Now I'm starting to wonder where else that pops up in GOP-authored legislation.

Comments

Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?



about notabbott.com

what is it?

notabbott.com is not spamming you -- please read

however, if you'd like e-mails about upcoming shows and whatnot, click here

recent entries in MAIN

Domino Effects
March 4, 2015

Housekeeping note
January 2, 2014

Slacker Profiteering
July 7, 2013

In My Defense
June 20, 2013

When A Foul Isn't A Foul
February 5, 2013

archives by month

credits

Creative Commons License
All content on this website (including text, photographs, audio files, and any other original works), unless otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons License.