March 04, 2015
Domino Effects
NP: Shuffle Play
Yeah, I'm as surprised that I'm posting as you are. But I was reading the opening arguments in King vs. Burwell, and I don't think I can summarize what I'm thinking into 140 characters. And I definitely don't see any good coming from posting it to Facebook.
My question is this. If Justice Kennedy thinks that overturning the subsidies in states that did not set up their own exchanges will introduce unconstitutional coercion, then is it the Supreme Court decision that is introducing that unconstitutionality, or can it then be ascribed back to the original Affordable Care Act itself? And would that, in turn, make it possible for the whole law to be struck down as unconstitutional?
Of course, I have comments turned off now, so this is more of a rhetorical question. But it's one that had nowhere else to go.
about notabbott.com
what is it?
notabbott.com is not spamming you -- please read
however, if you'd like e-mails about upcoming shows and whatnot, click here
and if you saw this site plastered on the front of a bass drum, you can find more information about the bands I'm in (including Diver and Andrew Fraker & Sons) right here
search
recent entries in MAIN
Domino Effects
March 4, 2015
March 4, 2015
Housekeeping note
January 2, 2014
Slacker Profiteering
July 7, 2013
In My Defense
June 20, 2013
When A Foul Isn't A Foul
February 5, 2013
archives by month
March 2015
1 posts
January 2014
1 posts
July 2013
1 posts
June 2013
1 posts
February 2013
1 posts
January 2013
4 posts
COMPLETE MONTHLY ARCHIVES
1 posts
January 2014
1 posts
July 2013
1 posts
June 2013
1 posts
February 2013
1 posts
January 2013
4 posts
COMPLETE MONTHLY ARCHIVES
credits
All content on this website (including text, photographs, audio files, and any other original works), unless otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
